Correios phishing kit

In the last few weeks I have noticed that attacks on Correios are constant. I have studied the matter a bit: it is the Brazilian state company that manages shipments and payments related to them.

The scam is always the same, attackers write to users saying that a shipment is blocked and that a small payment is needed to unblock it. What is interesting about this attack is that the user by entering the CPF (Cadastro de Pessoas Físicas) gets his data displayed on the page and this certainly appears to the user as something reliable.

The domain used for the attack is cpf-pendente[.]co[.]ua and it was registered few hours ago.

The first curiosity is that the archive is a RAR instead of a ZIP. Someone hoped to make life difficult for Matrix but I love writing code and this allows Matrix to open different types of archives, including obviously RAR 🙂

Aside from the type of archive, my curiosity about this kit was given by the functionality of extracting user data starting from the CPF. I do not know the Brazilian law but that from a simple number you can extract personal data seems unsafe to me.

The kit uses an external service to resolve the client data. This service I assume is part of the attack and probably uses another service in turn, perhaps legitimate or a leak from who knows where. This service is available at the domain anonimobusca[.]online. It was registered one week ago.

To obtain the user information, the phishing kit, uses a specific resource exposed by the second domain

Another aspect is related to how payments are collected. The kit does not in fact collect itself he payment data. The user makes the payment using systems that manage transactions. The services used to perform the transactions are:

  • paguesafe[.]com
  • atlaspagamentos[.]com

The URLs used are:

  • hxxps://checkout[.]paguesafe[.]io/pl/mn7xXvjg2N
  • hxxps://checkout[.]atlaspagamentos[.]com/pl/RQ9Kz7XTf8

Both services have been active for a short time, they use cheap providers for domain management and have free certificates. In short, I would say that nothing seems to give trust to these services.

To this I would like to add that the two graphical interfaces are practically the same.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.